Case 1401182/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Harvey Shopfitters Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1401182/2021
- Decision date
- 30 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case of Mr A Allen v Harvey Shopfitters Limited was heard at Bristol by video on 19 November 2021 before Employment Judge A Richardson. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by its director, Mr V Nolan. The tribunal’s judgment was that the claimant’s claims for arrears of holiday pay and unlawful deduction from wages were not well founded and were dismissed.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment. The attached schedule also refers to a number of proposed Equality Act 2010 amendment incidents, including references to sections 13, 19 and 26 and to the protected characteristics of race and disability, but the recorded judgment outcome itself is limited to dismissal of the holiday pay and unlawful deduction from wages claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Claim for arrears of holiday pay was held not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unlawful deduction from wages was held not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.