Case 1401191/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs D Payne v Sweet For You Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1401191/2020
- Decision date
- 6 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs D Payne
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 27 May 2021, the tribunal gave Mrs D Payne an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why her claim should not be struck out. The reason given was that she had not complied with the tribunal's orders dated 11 March 2021 and 11 May 2021, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mrs Payne did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations explaining why strike-out should not follow, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Dawson ordered that the claim be struck out.
The judgment records no substantive findings on the merits of any underlying employment claims and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claims; it records only that 'the claim' was struck out for failure to comply with tribunal orders and for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.