Case 1401195/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Edgerley v Dumbledore Dental Care Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1401195/2024
- Decision date
- 12 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Edgerley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 8 May 2024. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge proceeded under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On the substance of the claim, the tribunal found that Dumbledore Dental Care Limited had made unauthorised deductions from Miss E Edgerley’s wages. The respondent was ordered to pay £1,000 gross. The judgment also states that no separate award was made for alleged unpaid holiday pay because that was not supported by the Grounds of Claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £1,000 gross. It also said there was no separate award for alleged unpaid holiday pay because that was not supported by the Grounds of Claim. | Upheld | — | £1,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,000
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21, Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.