Case 1401202/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Kershaw Ms J Shelley v Miss Beryl Huse t/a The Forest Inn - In Bankruptcy — 2020
- Case reference
- 1401202/2019
- Decision date
- 1 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Kershaw Ms J Shelley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letters dated 23 March 2020 and 15 April 2020, the Tribunal told the Claimants that they could make written representations or request a hearing on why the claims should not be struck out for failure to comply with the Tribunal's orders of 30 March 2020 and 22 April 2020 and because the claims had not been actively pursued.
The Claimants did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On 1 May 2020 Employment Judge Gray struck out the claims in case numbers 1401202/2019, 1401206/2019, 1402724/2019 and 1402725/2019. The judgment records no merits findings and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The body of the judgment only states that the claims were struck out; the linked listing categories refer to National Minimum Wage and unlawful deduction from wages. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The body of the judgment only states that the claims were struck out; the linked listing category refers to Working Time Regulations. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.