Case 1401202/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Roy Franklin v Muller UK and Ireland LLP — 2021
- Case reference
- 1401202/2020
- Decision date
- 19 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Christensen Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Roy Franklin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It recorded that orders or letters dated 6 August 2020, 23 February 2021 and 11 March 2021 gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out.
The stated reasons were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order and later correspondence, and that the claim had not been actively pursued. The Employment Judge was satisfied that the relevant correspondence had been sent and that the claimant had not responded or made sufficient representations, so the claim was struck out and the listed hearing did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment identifies the claim as struck out after the claimant failed to comply with tribunal directions and had not actively pursued the claim. The underlying claim type is taken from the listing category and Layer 1 hint, as the short judgment itself does not set out the pleaded cause of action beyond striking out the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.