Case 1401205/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Dawkins v The Moody Goose Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 1401205/2025
- Decision date
- 21 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Dawkins
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Bristol Employment Tribunal on 1 April 2025. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that The Moody Goose Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Miss L Dawkins's wages. The judgment therefore upheld the unlawful deduction from wages claim.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £377.60. The judgment does not identify any separate split of that sum into different remedy heads, and no other relief is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure. The judgment records that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £378 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £378
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.