Case 1401206/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Kosinski v Hawkley Group Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401206/2023
- Decision date
- 24 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Kosinski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Southampton Employment Tribunals on 17 March 2023. The respondent did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The hearing listed for 22 June 2023 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that Hawkley Group Limited had made unauthorised deductions from Mr P Kosinski's wages in the sum of £2,395.47. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay his holiday entitlement of £767.35. The judgment records that the respondent had paid £440 on 24 February 2023.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay Mr Kosinski £2,722.82 in total. The judgment does not break down the £440 payment by head of claim, but the total awarded reflects the sums found due in the judgment after taking that payment into account.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,395 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £767 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,723
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.