Case 1401207/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr D Reynolds, Director Tried to attend, but VHS system defeated all attempts — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401207/2023
- Decision date
- 7 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal corrected the respondent's name to Oven Support South West Limited after finding that the claimant's payslips and HMRC correspondence showed that company to be the employer. It accepted the claimant's evidence that he had been paid by that entity for a number of months and noted that the respondent had not replied to the tribunal office's request for comments on the identity of the correct employer.
On the merits, the tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's wages for January 2023 (£1,885.00) and February 2023 (£718.50). It held that those deductions were not authorised and were therefore unlawful deductions from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
For remedy, the tribunal accepted that the claimant had taken out a £760.00 loan from his girlfriend and that this loss was directly attributable to the unpaid wages. The claimant did not pursue his separate heads of loss for rent and lost universal credit after the tribunal explained why those items were not recoverable on the facts as put. Applying section 24(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £3,363.50 gross, comprising the unpaid wages and the consequential loan loss.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that wages for January 2023 (£1,885.00) and February 2023 (£718.50) had not been paid and that the deductions were not authorised. It also accepted that the claimant had taken out a £760.00 loan from his girlfriend that was directly attributable to the unpaid wages. The claimant's rent and universal credit heads of loss were explained as not attributable or not pursued. | Upheld | — | £3,364 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,364
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,364
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.24(2) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.