Case 1401218/2019 · Employment Tribunal
J Blatch v Domino’s Pizza Westcountry Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1401218/2019
- Decision date
- 25 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Oldroyd Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
J Blatch
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a CVP hearing in Bristol on 12 July 2024 before Employment Judge Oldroyd, the tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment records that the claim had not been actively pursued and that it was no longer possible to have a fair hearing.
The tribunal relied on Rules 37(1)(d) and (e) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure. No substantive determination of the underlying dispute is recorded, and the short judgment does not set out findings on the merits of any pleaded claim.
The record states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of sending the record of decision. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the pleaded substantive claim(s). It states that the claim was struck out under Rules 37(1)(d) and (e) because it had not been actively pursued and it was no longer possible to have a fair hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rules 37(1)(d) and (e) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.