Case 1401226/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In Person v In Person CONSENT — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401226/2023
- Decision date
- 26 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Appearances
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Smail, sitting at Exeter by video on 11 September 2023, made a consent judgment in the claim brought by Mrs K. Couch against Mrs Shan Spencer t/a The Old Inn. The respondent agreed to pay the claimant £555 by 30 September 2023 in respect of failing to issue an updated statement of conditions of employment in writing.
The respondent also agreed to pay the equivalent of 3% gross employer pension contributions for the period from 1 September 2019 to the termination of employment on 20 January 2023. The judgment records that the calculation of that sum was to be agreed by 25 September 2023 and paid by 30 September 2023.
All payments were to be made by electronic transfer into the claimant's bank account. Save as aforesaid, the claimant's claims were dismissed. The judgment does not give reasons on the merits beyond the agreed terms.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Consent judgment payment in respect of failing to issue an updated statement of conditions of employment in writing; payable by 30 September 2023. | Settled | — | £555 |
| Breach of contract | Consent judgment payment of the equivalent of 3% gross employer pension contributions for the period from 1 September 2019 to 20 January 2023. The calculation was to be agreed by 25 September 2023 and paid by 30 September 2023; the extracted text does not state the amount. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.