Case 1401230/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Randall v Actor Bank Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401230/2023
- Decision date
- 21 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bax Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Randall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 21 March 2023. The respondent presented a valid response on 21 April 2023 stating that it did not defend the claim, and the Employment Judge determined the matter under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The hearing listed for 22 June 2023 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and held that the claim was well founded. It ordered the respondent to pay Ms N Randall £2,022.39 gross, with credit to be given for any payments already made towards that sum. The judgment does not separate the award into distinct heads of loss beyond that wage-sum payment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent did not defend the claim. The tribunal found the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages well founded and ordered payment of £2,022.39 gross, with credit for any payments already made towards the sum due. | Upheld | — | £2,022 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,022
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.