Case 1401237/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Chef's For Chef's Hospitality Recruitment Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1401237/2020
- Decision date
- 10 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 10 October 2020, the Tribunal gave both claimants an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why their claims should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The judgment records that the claimants failed to make representations in writing, or failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claims. No substantive findings on the underlying merits are recorded in the judgment, and no monetary remedy is awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type. By letter dated 10 October 2020, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued; no sufficient representations were made. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type. By letter dated 10 October 2020, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not being actively pursued; no sufficient representations were made. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.