Case 1401240/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R. Robson v The Met Office — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401240/2022
- Decision date
- 4 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Appearances
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R. Robson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a one-page judgment on disability heard at Exeter on 10 March 2023 before Employment Judge Smail. The respondent conceded that Miss Robson was disabled with facial disfigurement at all material times.
The tribunal also determined that Miss Robson was additionally disabled with post herpetic neuralgia, consequent upon shingles, from 13 September 2022. The judgment records no monetary award and does not decide the merits of any underlying discrimination complaint.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary judgment on disability status only. The respondent conceded that the claimant was disabled with facial disfigurement at all material times, and the tribunal additionally found that she was disabled with post herpetic neuralgia, consequent upon shingles, from 13 September 2022. No substantive liability or remedy issues were determined in this judgment. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.