Case 1401248/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Hosker v Mcisla Recruitment Devon Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401248/2023
- Decision date
- 15 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Volkmer Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Hosker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 22 March 2023. The respondent, Mcisla Recruitment Devon Limited, failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Volkmer determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay Mr D Hosker the net sum of £759.88.
The judgment records £759.88 as both the amount found due on the claim and the total amount payable.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal determined the claim under rule 21 and found unauthorised deductions from wages. | Upheld | — | £760 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £760
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.