Case 1401253/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Tucker v Mr Kian Johnson — 2022
- Case reference
- 1401253/2022
- Decision date
- 15 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs K Tucker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 6 April 2022. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge made a determination under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 without a contested hearing.
The judgment records that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £106 gross in respect of that claim.
The judgment also states that the hearing listed for 17 March 2023 was cancelled. No other claim outcome, legal test, or separate remedy breakdown is set out in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records a Rule 21 determination because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. It states only that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and must pay £106 gross. | Upheld | — | £106 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £106
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.