Case 1401255/2021 · Employment Tribunal
(1) Miss Emily Hamill-Loader (2) Mr Oliver Henshall v Vertman Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1401255/2021
- Decision date
- 28 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Le Grys
Parties
2 namedClaimant
(1) Miss Emily Hamill-Loader (2) Mr Oliver Henshall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claims of Miss Emily Hamill-Loader and Mr Oliver Henshall against Vertman Ltd at Bristol by video on 4 February 2022. Employment Judge Le Grys found that each claimant's claim for holiday pay accrued but unpaid holiday was well founded.
The respondent was ordered to pay the first claimant £2,692.40, calculated as 20 days at £134.62 gross, and to pay the second claimant the same amount on the same basis. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | First claimant: claim for holiday pay accrued but unpaid holiday was found well founded; award of £2,692.40, representing 20 days x £134.62 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,692 |
| Holiday pay | Second claimant: claim for holiday pay accrued but unpaid holiday was found well founded; award of £2,692.40, representing 20 days x £134.62 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,692 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,385
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.