Case 1401256/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Gupta v Carbon60 Limited and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 1401256/2024
- Decision date
- 28 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr R Gupta
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr R Gupta brought a claim against Carbon60 Limited and Carbon60 AG, heard at Bristol Employment Tribunal by video on 7 February 2025 before Employment Judge Ferguson. The claimant appeared in person and the respondents were represented by counsel.
The Tribunal dismissed the claim because it lacked territorial jurisdiction to consider it. The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying complaint, and the extracted text does not identify the specific legal cause of action.
The written record also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's note. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment records only that the claim was dismissed because the Tribunal lacked territorial jurisdiction to consider it; the underlying cause of action is not identified in the text supplied. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.