Case 1401277/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v KC Realisations (2019) Ltd (in Administration) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1401277/2018
- Decision date
- 20 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Emerton Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Southampton by Employment Judge Emerton sitting alone on 20 December 2019. Mr A Harris appeared in person and the respondent was not represented. The tribunal found that the claim of unfair dismissal was well founded.
On remedy, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £1,774.50 and a compensatory award of £2,693.00. The judgment also records that the Recoupment Regulations do not apply. Written reasons were not provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim well founded and awarded a basic award of £1,774.50 plus a compensatory award of £2,693.00. The judgment records that the Recoupment Regulations do not apply. | Upheld | — | £4,468 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,468
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,775
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,693
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.