Case 1401277/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Wren v Zybre Limited and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401277/2023
- Decision date
- 3 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ferguson Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss L Wren
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 24 March 2023. The respondents failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On the papers, the tribunal found that the first respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and awarded £8,232 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £5,000 in damages.
The tribunal further found that the first respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £2,058. The total awarded was £15,290. The judgment does not record any separate award against the second respondent.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the first respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and must pay £8,232 gross. No separate apportionment is given between the respondents, but the award is made against the first respondent only. | Upheld | — | £8,232 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and that the first respondent must pay £5,000 in damages. No separate apportionment is given between the respondents, but the award is made against the first respondent only. | Upheld | — | £5,000 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the first respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and must pay £2,058. No separate apportionment is given between the respondents, but the award is made against the first respondent only. | Upheld | — | £2,058 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,290
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.