Case 1401280/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms D Altun v The Commercial Law Practice Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1401280/2018
- Decision date
- 19 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson
- Venue
- Southampton
- Panel members
- Ms J Ratnayake, Mr K Sleeth
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms D Altun
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment at Southampton on 17 to 19 July 2019, before Employment Judge Dawson with Ms J Ratnayake and Mr K Sleeth, records that the tribunal’s unanimous decision was that the claimant’s claims were dismissed. The extracted text does not set out the individual findings or reasoning for each head of claim, and it does not record any remedy award.
The claim headings used here are inferred from the gov.uk listing categories for the case, namely unfair dismissal, sex discrimination, and maternity or pregnancy rights. The judgment text itself contains no further detail on the factual issues, legal tests applied, or any apportionment of liability or compensation.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The extracted judgment text does not list individual heads of claim; this claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing categories. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The extracted judgment text does not list individual heads of claim; this claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing categories. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Sex discrimination | The extracted judgment text does not list individual heads of claim; this claim type is inferred from the gov.uk listing categories. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.