Case 1401287/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Mills v William Gilder Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1401287/2019
- Decision date
- 23 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Mills
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a strike out judgment under rule 37. By letter dated 9 August 2019, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out because he had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 23 April 2019 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. As a result, the hearing listed for 12 to 13 November 2019 did not take place.
The judgment does not set out the underlying substantive cause of action in the text provided, and it does not record any remedy or monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action in the text provided; it only states that 'the claim' is struck out under rule 37 for non-compliance with an order and because it has not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.