Case 1401292/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Y Tang v Valinger Technologies Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1401292/2021
- Decision date
- 6 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Y Tang
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 Employment Tribunal judgment in which the tribunal determined the claim on the papers. The respondent, Valinger Technologies Limited, was found to have made an unauthorised deduction from Mr Y Tang's wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £4,182.41 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of the gross sum of £974.17 for that matter. The judgment does not separate any further heads of loss or identify any additional remedy beyond those two gross sums.
The total amount ordered by the tribunal was £5,156.58. No discrimination, dismissal, or other non-wage claims are recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment ordered payment of the gross sum of £4,182.41 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £4,182 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment ordered payment of the gross sum of £974.17 for failure to pay holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £974 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,157
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.