Case 1401318/2019 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Andrew Harvey and Lisa Harvey (In partnership T/a Proper Ansome Cafe) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1401318/2019
- Decision date
- 11 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Employment Tribunal in Plymouth on 11 October 2019, Employment Judge N J Roper recorded a judgment by consent in favour of the claimant, Miss Nicola Lumley, against Andrew Harvey and Lisa Harvey trading as Proper Ansome Café. The claimant was listed as appearing in person, and the respondents also appeared in person.
The tribunal stated that the claimant succeeded in her claim for breach of contract and for accrued but unpaid holiday pay. The judgment does not set out separate factual findings or legal reasoning beyond recording the parties' consent to judgment.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £391.50. The judgment does not split that amount between the two heads of claim and records no additional remedy components.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Judgment by consent; the tribunal recorded success in breach of contract and ordered a single gross sum without splitting the award between heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal recorded success for accrued but unpaid holiday pay and ordered a single gross sum without splitting the award between heads of claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £392
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.