Case 1401331/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K. McNerney (Counsel) First v Mrs S. Wadsworth (in person) Second Respondent: Mrs L. Gande (in person) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1401331/2020
- Decision date
- 21 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Smail Appearances
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K. McNerney (Counsel) First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the Claimant’s employer at the time of dismissal was the First Respondent, the estate of Michael Beardsley (deceased). On that basis, it ordered the First Respondent to pay the Claimant a redundancy payment of £8,374.20.
The tribunal also ordered payment of £3,093.72 by way of notice payment. The judgment records the total sum due as £11,467.92, payable within 14 days from the estate of Michael Beardsley (deceased). Full oral reasons were given at the hearing, but the extracted judgment does not set out further findings beyond the monetary awards.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal ordered the First Respondent, the estate of Michael Beardsley (deceased), to pay the Claimant a redundancy payment of £8,374.20. | Upheld | — | £8,374 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal ordered the First Respondent to pay a notice payment of £3,093.72. | Upheld | — | £3,094 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,468
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.