Case 1401335/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Jackson v NDML Concept Build Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401335/2023
- Decision date
- 28 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Jackson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr J Jackson, brought claims for unlawful deductions from wages and breach of contract against NDML Concept Build Ltd. The case was heard at Bristol by video on 10 July 2023 before Employment Judge Livesey. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not attend.
The tribunal held that the claimant's claims of unlawful deductions from wages and breach of contract succeeded. The written judgment records a gross award of £3,500. It does not apportion that sum between the two claims.
The judgment was given orally at the hearing and the written record notes that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days. No further factual findings or legal analysis are set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim succeeded, but it does not split the £3,500 award between this claim and the breach of contract claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim succeeded, but it does not split the £3,500 award between this claim and the unlawful deductions claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.