Case 1401339/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Louise Anderson v AND South West Thermal Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1401339/2023
- Decision date
- 25 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Louise Anderson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment dated 10 April 2024. The claimant did not pursue a claim for unfair dismissal, and the tribunal therefore dealt only with the remaining claims on the papers after the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented.
The tribunal found that the claimant's normal weekly pay was £330.00 gross, and that including overtime her average net weekly pay for the last twelve weeks of employment was £401.64 per week. On that basis it held that she was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £660.00, calculated as 2 x £330.00 gross weekly pay.
The claimant's breach of contract claim succeeded, and the respondent was ordered to pay two weeks' notice pay in the net sum of £403.28. Her claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay also succeeded, with an award of 9.5 days' pay in the gross sum of £627.00. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to issue a written statement of particulars of employment and ordered payment of two weeks' pay, £660.00, under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment awarded at 2 x £330.00 gross weekly pay. | Upheld | — | £660 |
| Breach of contract | Two weeks' notice pay awarded in the net sum of £403.28. | Upheld | — | £403 |
| Holiday pay | Accrued but unpaid holiday pay awarded for 9.5 days' pay in the gross sum of £627.00. | Upheld | — | £627 |
| Other | Award under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 for failure to issue a written statement of particulars of employment; two weeks' pay awarded at £660.00. | Upheld | — | £660 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,350
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21
- section 38 of the Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.