Case 1401355/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs B Ferry v Coyco Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1401355/2019
- Decision date
- 23 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Goraj Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs B Ferry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which no response had been presented by the Respondent, Coyco Limited, and the Employment Judge decided the case on the information before the tribunal. The Claimant was Mrs B Ferry. The tribunal found that the Respondent had made unlawful deductions from the Claimant’s wages.
The tribunal also found that the Respondent had discriminated against the Claimant because of her pregnancy/maternity. The judgment does not set out further factual findings or legal reasoning in the extracted text.
The judgment records that the appropriate remedy would be determined at a remedy hearing to be confirmed, so no monetary award is stated in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; no response was presented by the Respondent and the decision was made on the information before the Employment Judge. Remedy was not determined in this judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Rule 21 judgment; no response was presented by the Respondent and the decision was made on the information before the Employment Judge. Remedy was not determined in this judgment. | Upheld | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.