Case 1401357/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Ms DL Baldwin v UK English International — 2018
- Case reference
- 1401357/2017
- Decision date
- 29 August 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R. Harper
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms DL Baldwin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 11 August 2018, the Tribunal gave the Respondent an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why its response should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The Respondent did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the response. The judgment does not decide the underlying merits of the claim, and it does not record any monetary award.
The order also states that the Respondent remains entitled to notice of future hearings and decisions, but may only participate in any hearing to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge. The hearing date on 13 and 14 September 2018 remained listed at the date of the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not determine the substantive claim. It strikes out the Respondent's response because it had not been actively pursued and the Respondent did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.