Case 1401359/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Zoe Morrison v AND Heartlands Trust (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 1401359/2024
- Decision date
- 7 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Zoe Morrison
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave judgment under Rule 21 because the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented.
The claimant's statutory redundancy payment claim was recorded as well-founded but dismissed on withdrawal because it had already been paid. Her breach of contract claim succeeded because she was dismissed without notice on 31 January 2024, and the respondent was ordered to pay seven weeks' notice pay in the net sum of £3,392.34.
The claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment states the statutory redundancy payment claim was well-founded but dismissed on withdrawal because it had already been paid. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The award is for seven weeks' notice pay following dismissal without notice. | Upheld | — | £3,392 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states the accrued but unpaid holiday pay claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,392
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.