Case 1401363/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Wells Cathedral School and Mr M Stringer — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401363/2019
- Decision date
- 30 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Cadney, sitting alone, refused the claimants' application for reconsideration of the judgment promulgated on 13 June 2023. The judge said the only ground for reconsideration was whether it was necessary in the interests of justice, and cited Outasight VB Ltd v Brown as authority that the tribunal has a broad discretion under Rule 70.
The claimants argued that the judgment date was unclear, that there was insufficient comment on credibility, and that evidence from Gwyneth Nelmes and Hanako Dickinson had been treated wrongly. The judge said the case did not turn fundamentally on witness credibility, that the respondent's evidence on the restructure and on the offer of compassionate leave in place of suspension had been accepted, and that the tribunal's reasons already addressed the matters raised.
The judge also rejected the submission that there had been an agenda or conspiracy, saying the allegations had been considered and not proved, and that the evidence relied on by the claimants did not justify revisiting the original conclusions. The application was dismissed because there was no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked at a reconsideration hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The reconsideration judgment refers to the original merits judgment promulgated on 13 June 2023 and records that the claimants' claims were dismissed. It does not restate a separate contractual remedy or split the dismissal by head of claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The reconsideration judgment records that the original claims were dismissed and then refuses reconsideration. No separate monetary award or head-by-head breakdown is given in the reconsideration reasons. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 70 interests of justice
- Outasight VB Ltd v Brown
- Rule 72(1) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.