Case 1401372/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Phillips v The Cosy Winter Pub Company Ltd Heard by Cloud Video — 2020
- Case reference
- 1401372/2020
- Decision date
- 29 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Reed Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Phillips
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge Reed by Cloud Video on 29 October 2020, with the claimant appearing in person and no attendance for the respondent. The tribunal entered judgment for the claimant on all four numbered claims.
It found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £3,019.53. It also found that the respondent had failed to make payment for holiday accrued and untaken, awarding £1,728.14 for that head of claim.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and directed payment of £3,019.53. | Upheld | — | £3,020 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to make a payment for holiday accrued and untaken and directed payment of £1,728.14. | Upheld | — | £1,728 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent breached the contract by failing to give notice of dismissal and awarded damages of £1,865. | Upheld | — | £1,865 |
| Other | The tribunal found the respondent failed to provide a statement of principal terms of employment and directed payment of £2,100. | Upheld | — | £2,100 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,713
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.