Case 1401375/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Z Stanislawczyk v Julia Polish Food Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1401375/2020
- Decision date
- 24 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Z Stanislawczyk
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard Ms Z Stanislawczyk's claims against Julia Polish Food Ltd at Bristol by video on 19 March 2021. The respondent did not attend. The tribunal first held that the claims had been issued out of time, but that it had not been reasonably practicable for them to have been issued in time and that they were presented within such further time as was reasonable.
The claimant succeeded in complaints described as breach of contract relating to notice, unpaid holiday pay, unlawful deductions from wages, and failure to provide written particulars of employment. The judgment records that these heads of claim were all successful.
The tribunal awarded £265.00 for one week's notice pay, £1,166.64 for 4.06 weeks' holiday pay, £833.28 for unpaid wages less sums received, and £574.70 for failure to provide full written particulars of employment, described as two weeks' pay. The total award was £2,839.62.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay: 1 week, awarded at £265.00. | Upheld | — | £265 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday pay: 4.06 weeks, awarded at £1,166.64. | Upheld | — | £1,167 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages, less sums received, awarded at £833.28. | Upheld | — | £833 |
| Other | Failure to provide full written particulars of employment: 2 weeks' pay, awarded at £574.70. | Upheld | — | £575 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,840
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 30 Working Time Regulations
- Article 7 Extension of Jurisdiction Order
- reasonably practicable / further time as was reasonable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.