Case 1401376/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Emma Trerise v AND Inferno Southwest Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1401376/2020
- Decision date
- 29 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Emma Trerise
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was entered under Rule 21 because the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. On that basis, the tribunal held that the claimant's claim for unlawful deduction from wages succeeded because the respondent failed to pay her in accordance with the National Minimum Wage.
The tribunal also held that the claimant's claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay succeeded. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £405.00 in respect of that holiday pay claim.
The judgment states that the appropriate remedy for the unlawful deduction from wages claim would be determined at a later hearing, with notice to be sent in due course. No separate final monetary figure was recorded for that claim in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim succeeded because the respondent failed to pay the claimant in accordance with the National Minimum Wage. The remedy for this claim was to be determined at a later hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claimant's claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay succeeded, and the respondent was ordered to pay the gross sum of £405.00. | Upheld | — | £405 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £405
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.