Case 1401379/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Harrison v Black Swan Pastimes Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 1401379/2018
- Decision date
- 17 August 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Harrison
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Black Swan Pastimes Limited had made unlawful deductions from Miss C Harrison’s wages between 28 September and 1 December 2017. The gross amount identified for that claim was £102.23, subject to an agreed deduction of £5.75, resulting in £96.48 payable on that head of claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay arrears of holiday pay due to the claimant for the holiday year January to December 2017. That arrears figure was assessed at £320.07. In total, the respondent was ordered to pay £416.55.
The claimant’s application for a Preparation Time Order was refused.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unlawful deductions from wages in the period 28 September to 1 December 2017. The gross sum identified was £102.23, less an agreed deduction of £5.75, giving £96.48. | Upheld | — | £96 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay arrears of holiday pay due for the holiday year January to December 2017. The amount identified was £320.07 gross. | Upheld | — | £320 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £417
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.