Case 1401382/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Henry Kirkpatrick v Future Kings Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401382/2023
- Decision date
- 3 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Walters Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Henry Kirkpatrick
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Bristol by video on 19 July 2023, Employment Judge Walters recorded that the respondent did not appear. The claimant, Mr Henry Kirkpatrick, brought a breach of contract claim arising from non-payment of contractual notice pay against Future Kings Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation).
The tribunal upheld the claim that the respondent breached the contract of employment by failing to pay the claimant his contractual notice pay. It ordered the respondent to pay the balance of the claimant's contractual notice pay, described as three months' notice pay less one week's gross pay, in the sum of £5,769.31.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal upheld the claim that the respondent breached the contract of employment by failing to pay contractual notice pay. The order was for the balance of three months' contractual notice pay, described as three months less one week's gross pay. | Upheld | — | £5,769 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,769
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.