Case 1401390/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J M BARRERA BELTRI v Gt Designz Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401390/2023
- Decision date
- 25 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J M BARRERA BELTRI
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under rule 21 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Cadney therefore made a determination on the claim on the papers.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £2,191.19 gross. It also found that the respondent failed to provide written particulars of the main terms of employment and awarded four weeks' wages of £1,618.08 gross in respect of that failure.
The total amount awarded was £3,809.27 gross. The judgment does not set out any separate award for interest or other heads of loss.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,191 |
| Other | Claim succeeded on the tribunal's finding that the respondent failed to provide written particulars of the main terms of employment; the judgment awards four weeks' wages. | Upheld | — | £1,618 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,809
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.