Case 1401392/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Dooley v South West Wave Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1401392/2022
- Decision date
- 27 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson Appearances
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Dooley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 23 September 2022 at Southampton, Employment Judge Dawson dealt with two claims brought by Mr R Dooley against South West Wave Limited. The respondent did not attend. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered it to pay the gross sum of £2,265.12.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,138.40, which the respondent was ordered to pay. The judgment states that the recoupment provisions do not apply. No other claims or remedies were recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,265.12. | Upheld | — | £2,265 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £2,138.40. | Upheld | — | £2,138 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,404
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.