Case 1401400/2018 · Employment Tribunal
No Appearance For the v SEaB Energy Ltd (In Administration) — 2019
- Case reference
- 1401400/2018
- Decision date
- 2 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Appearances
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No Appearance For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Southampton on 2 August 2019 before Employment Judge Rayner. Neither the claimant nor the respondent appeared. The tribunal proceeded under Rule 21 on the basis of the information before it.
The judgment records that, on that basis, the claimant was awarded £5,479.45 in respect of all arrears of pay and notice pay as claimed. The respondent, SEaB Energy Limited (in administration), was ordered to pay that sum within 14 days.
The record does not separate the award between arrears of pay and notice pay. It also notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested by a party within 14 days of the sending of the record of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal awarded the claimant a single aggregate sum that included arrears of pay, but the judgment did not split the amount between this claim and the notice pay claim. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal awarded the claimant a single aggregate sum that included notice pay, but the judgment did not split the amount between this claim and the arrears of pay claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,479
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.