Case 1401406/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Mazurkiewicz v Solent Blue Line Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1401406/2023
- Decision date
- 25 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray AND
- Venue
- Southampton
- Panel members
- Mr Jenkins, Mr Wakeman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Mazurkiewicz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Mazurkiewicz’s case against Solent Blue Line Limited was heard at Southampton on 8 to 10 April 2024 before Employment Judge Gray, sitting with Mr Jenkins and Mr Wakeman. The tribunal’s unanimous judgment was that her complaints of unfair dismissal, discrimination arising from disability, and failure in the duty to make reasonable adjustments all failed and were dismissed.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons are provided in the document supplied. No monetary award is recorded, because all claims were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records this as a complaint of failure in the duty to make reasonable adjustments. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records this as a complaint of discrimination arising from disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.