Case 1401413/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Freeman v Peppermill Pubs Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1401413/2020
- Decision date
- 11 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bax Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Freeman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim for unlawful deductions from wages was found well founded, and the Respondent was ordered to pay the Claimant the gross sum of £642.86. The judgment also records that the Respondent did not attend the hearing before Employment Judge J Bax at Bristol on 7 May 2021.
The claim for breach of contract in respect of notice succeeded, with a gross award of £692.31. The claim for accrued but untaken holiday was also found well founded, and the Respondent was ordered to pay £969.23 gross. The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £643 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £692 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £969 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,304
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.