Case 1401416/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Luke McCauley v AND Mr Books Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1401416/2020
- Decision date
- 27 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Luke McCauley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case in chambers at Plymouth on 21 May 2020 under Rule 21 after the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. It dealt with the matter on the papers and recorded the claimant as Mr Luke McCauley and the respondent as Mr Books Limited.
The tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £576.93, calculated as 1.5 x £384.62 gross per week. It also found that the claimant’s claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay succeeded.
For the holiday pay claim, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay nine days’ pay in the gross sum of £692.28. The judgment records no further heads of loss or separate interest award, and the total monetary award on the face of the judgment is £1,269.21.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal held the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £576.93, calculated as 1.5 x £384.62 gross per week. | Upheld | — | £577 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal upheld the claim for accrued but unpaid holiday pay and ordered payment of nine days' pay in the gross sum of £692.28. | Upheld | — | £692 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,269
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.