Case 1401448/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Bond v Property Krowd Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 1401448/2025
- Decision date
- 24 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Bond
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was presented in the Southampton Employment Tribunal on 24 April 2025. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge decided that a determination could properly be made of part of the claim under rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and directed the respondent to pay the claimant £1,593.75 gross in part satisfaction of the claim.
The claimant was given until 4pm on 12 January 2026 to notify the tribunal if she wished to pursue a claim for more than £1,593.75. If she does not do so by that date, the judgment will become the final judgment and the file will be closed without further order.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21/22 determination issued because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The £1,593.75 gross is awarded in part satisfaction of the claim; the claimant may notify the tribunal by 4pm on 12 January 2026 if she wishes to pursue a claim for more than this sum, otherwise the judgment becomes final. | Upheld | — | £1,594 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,594
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 of the Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.