Case 1401456/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Smith v Wilson Leisure Developments Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1401456/2023
- Decision date
- 15 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Bristol Employment Tribunals on 11 April 2023. The respondent, Wilson Leisure Developments Limited, did not present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. The judgment ordered the respondent to pay Miss H Smith £419.67 gross. The extracted judgment does not identify any separate working time finding or any other distinct claim outcome.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Default judgment under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal held that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £419.67 gross. | Upheld | — | £420 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £420
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.