Case 1401464/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Tidd v Devon & Somerset Fire & Rescue Service — 2024
- Case reference
- 1401464/2023
- Decision date
- 19 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Danvers Representation
- Venue
- Exeter Law Courts
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Tidd
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant brought complaints under the Working Time Regulations 1998. The complaints under Regulations 10 and 11 were found not to be well founded and were dismissed.
The complaint under Regulation 12 was dismissed upon withdrawal. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written judgment states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the specified period.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | Complaints under Regulations 10 and 11 Working Time Regulations 1998 were not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Complaint under Regulation 12 Working Time Regulations 1998 was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.