Case 1401467/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Tester v South West Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust — 2025
- Case reference
- 1401467/2024
- Decision date
- 18 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Livesey Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Tester
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a private telephone hearing in Bristol on 10 June 2025, Employment Judge Livesey recorded that the claimant's complaints of discrimination on the grounds of age and sex were dismissed upon withdrawal. The judgment identifies the claimant as Mrs S Tester and the respondent as South West Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, with Mr Pickett appearing for the claimant and Ms Egan for the respondent.
The judgment does not contain any substantive findings on liability for the age or sex discrimination complaints, and it does not set out reasons beyond the record that those complaints were dismissed upon withdrawal. It also states that all other claims were to proceed in accordance with the case management order of the same date.
No monetary remedy was awarded in this judgment, and no other claim outcomes are determined in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The tribunal recorded that the age discrimination complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal recorded that the sex discrimination complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.