Case 1401473/2024 · Employment Tribunal
M Arnold v Heaphy’s Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1401473/2024
- Decision date
- 27 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
M Arnold
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under rule 21 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore made a determination on the papers. The judgment records that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and awards damages of £327 for that claim.
The judgment also records that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. The tribunal ordered payment of £1,067.75 in respect of holiday pay. No separate findings, legal tests, or liability reasoning beyond the rule 21 determination are set out in the extracted text.
The total amount ordered by the tribunal was £1,394.75.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awards damages of £327. | Upheld | — | £327 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and orders payment of £1,067.75. | Upheld | — | £1,068 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,395
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.