Case 1401477/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Representing himself For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 1401477/2020
- Decision date
- 15 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dawson
- Venue
- Southampton
- Panel members
- Ms Sinclair, Ms Ratnayake
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Representing himself For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Southampton on 19 October 2021 before Employment Judge Dawson, sitting with Ms Sinclair and Ms Ratnayake. The claimant, Mr C Wright, represented himself and the respondent was represented by Ms Scott-Ellis, counsel.
The judgment contains no liability findings on the substance of the dispute. It records only that, upon withdrawal by the claimant, the claimant’s claims were dismissed.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment, and the extracted text does not identify any separate remedy findings, apportionment, or legal reasoning beyond the dismissal following withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not specify the underlying claim type. It records that the claimant withdrew the claims and that, upon that withdrawal, the claims were dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.