Case 1401486/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S B Christiansen v C & J Clark International Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1401486/2023
- Decision date
- 11 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Midgley Representation
- Venue
- Bristol
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S B Christiansen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Bristol on 28 March 2024, Employment Judge Midgley struck out the claims under Rule 37. The stated reason was that the claims had no reasonable prospect of success because the respondent was not the claimant's employer.
The judgment also records that the claims were dismissed. The extracted text does not itemise the underlying claim types, and it does not record any monetary award or other remedy.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record states that no written reasons would be provided unless requested in time. The decision was sent to the parties on 11 April 2024.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not itemise the individual claim types in the extracted text. It states that 'the claims' were struck out under Rule 37 because the respondent was not the claimant's employer, and also records that the claims were dismissed. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.