Case 1401488/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Arjona Martinez v NHS North Bristol Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 1401488/2022
- Decision date
- 6 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Roper
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Arjona Martinez
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered whether the claim should be struck out after a letter dated 16 June 2022 gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 23 May 2022 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Roper struck out the claim. The listed hearing for 8 November 2022 did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment text does not state the underlying head of claim, but the GOV.UK listing for this case categorises it as unlawful deduction from wages. The tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant had not complied with the order dated 23 May 2022 and had not actively pursued the claim, after giving an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.