Case 1401550/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the Second Claimant: Mrs. M Birch (Claimants Mother) For the v Mrs. Anne Cooke and 2 others — 2019
- Case reference
- 1401550/2018
- Decision date
- 5 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rayner Appearances
- Venue
- Southampton
Parties
4 namedClaimant
In person For the Second Claimant: Mrs. M Birch (Claimants Mother) For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis short judgment dealt only with case management. At a hearing in Southampton on 22 November 2019 before Employment Judge Rayner, the respondent, Mrs Anne Cooke t/a Reilley’s Café Restaurant and Bar, appeared in person. The first claimant, Mrs J Northam, appeared in person and the second claimant, Miss G Birch, was represented by her mother, Mrs M Birch.
The tribunal refused the respondent's renewed application to adjourn the hearing. It also dismissed the respondent's application for reconsideration of the judgment of Employment Judge Livesey dated 4 July 2018, which had been issued to the parties on 10 July 2018. The judgment of Employment Judge Livesey was therefore confirmed.
The reasons for the underlying 2018 judgment are not set out in this decision, so no substantive findings on the merits of the original employment claims appear in this text. The decision records only the refusal of the adjournment request and the dismissal of the reconsideration application.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Respondent's renewed application to adjourn the hearing was refused. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Respondent's application for reconsideration of the judgment of Employment Judge Livesey dated 4 July 2018 was dismissed and that judgment was confirmed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.